Join CEU Streamline
Login

Mastering Procedural Integrity: Fidelity Tips for ABA

shownotes Jul 24, 2025
 

 

Episode 3: Trends in Reporting Procedural Integrity | Behaviorist Book Club

Bonus Episode 3: Trends in Reporting Procedural Integrity – Practical Implications for Behavior Analysts

 

Episode Overview

In this episode, I break down Han et al.’s (2023) review of procedural integrity reporting across ABA journals and why fidelity should be your first troubleshooting step when treatment fails. You’ll also learn five low-effort strategies to make fidelity tracking part of your daily workflow.

Time-Stamped Outline

  • 00:00 – Welcome and episode overview
  • 01:00 – What is procedural integrity? Definitions and examples
  • 02:30 – Commission vs. omission errors in applied settings
  • 05:30 – Han et al. (2023): purpose, methodology, and findings
  • 09:00 – Why fidelity is the first place to check when plans fail
  • 11:30 – Five common barriers to fidelity data collection
  • 16:00 – Five practical strategies to improve fidelity

What Is Procedural Integrity?

Procedural integrity (also called fidelity) is the extent to which an intervention is implemented as designed. Two main error types:

  • Commission Errors: Adding something not in the plan (e.g., giving attention during extinction).
  • Omission Errors: Leaving out a required step (e.g., forgetting to reinforce a functional communication response).

Both compromise treatment integrity, muddy data, and undermine client progress.

Han et al. (2023) Findings

Han, K., Colbert, R., & Farley, M. (2023) reviewed procedural integrity reporting in JABA, BAP, and JOBM. Key insights:

  • Fidelity reporting is increasing but still underreported, especially in multi-component interventions.
  • Commission and omission errors persist despite guidelines.
  • Practical takeaway: Focus on real-world fidelity, not journal trends.

Why Fidelity Errors Are Common

  • High caseloads and limited supervision time
  • Multiple implementers rotating through cases
  • Lack of practical tools for tracking fidelity
  • Cultural barriers to error reporting

Without fidelity data, you lose your foundation for treatment decisions.

Five Common Barriers to Tracking Fidelity

  1. Fear of Correction: Hesitation to give real-time feedback.
  2. Time Constraints: Competing supervisory demands push fidelity checks aside.
  3. Technology Gaps: Missing templates or tracking systems.
  4. Reluctance for Self-Reporting: Implementers avoid admitting mistakes.
  5. Lack of Priority: Fidelity falls off the radar when everything “seems fine.”

Five Practical Fidelity Solutions

  • 1. Flexible Fidelity Data Sheets: Create generic templates for quick use across clients.
  • 2. Delegate & Normalize Error Reporting: Use team chats and share your own mistakes.
  • 3. Quick Hand-Drawn Graphs: Sketch fidelity trends post-session and snap a photo.
  • 4. Fidelity Talks in Every Supervision: Make fidelity a standing agenda item.
  • 5. Suspect Fidelity First: Always check fidelity before rewriting plans or FA reruns.

Why This Matters

High procedural integrity ensures treatment effectiveness and ethical practice. Before adjusting interventions, confirm they’re implemented correctly—it saves time and improves outcomes.

Resources


If you enjoyed this episode, subscribe to the podcast, leave a review, and share with colleagues. Your feedback helps shape future episodes.

© 2025 Behaviorist Book Club | Turning ABA research into practical action.

Solve your clinical challenges with research using this simple, 3 step process that saves you time and gets you clinical answers FAST.

Learn the Key Places Framework, the Research Finding Framework, and how they work together in this free minicourse.

Signing up will also subscribe you to the email list. Unsubscribe at anytime! We will never sell your information, for any reason.